Timothy
Liu ends his introduction to Word of Mouth by writing, "I
hope that Word of Mouth will find a welcome audience in literary
and cultural studies classes alike as well as the general poetry-reading
public, even as it complicates the issue of just how useful
the term 'gay American poetry' is for our own time and for generations
to come."
Accordingly,
Liu's table of contents immediately strikes the reader in its
range of poets, poets that rarely appear together in the same
text: Edwin Denby, James Broughton, William Bronk, Robert Duncan,
James Schuyler, Jack Spicer, Allen Ginsberg, James Merrill,
Frank O'Hara, John Ashbery, William Dickey, Thom Gunn, John
Wieners, Ronald Johnson, Frank Bidart, Kevin Killian, Mark Doty,
Reginald Shepherd and Justin Chin to name only a few.
Interestingly,
such a table of contents demonstrates the very problem that
Liu acknowledges in his introduction; that is, "is such
an anthology, based on questions or assumptions of 'gay' identity
even possible?, particularly when taking into account the divergent
poetic practices of 'gay' poets and the multiple formulations
of gay identity represented by gay poets." It appear that
in order to compile such an anthology, Liu recognizes that the
only legitimate organizational feature is the very refusal of
the central task of the anthology: to present a coherent, representative
account of a particular time, place, or poetic project.
And
yet, the move between W.H. Auden's "To-night, for instance,
now that /Bert has been here, I / listen to the piercing screams
/ of palliardisingcats / without self-pity" (6) and Ronald
Johnson's palm print (202) and Justin Chin's "lick the
dry shit out of my sweaty buttcheeks / I've had my hepatitis
shots so it's ok" (441) at once jars the reader into not
so much recognizing, as acknowledging, the range of poetic practice
carried out
over the past 50 years in the United States while allowing him
or her the pleasure of reading, and enjoying, poems he or she
might not otherwise consider, depending on his or her own reading
prejudices.
The
fact that these divergent practices are umbrellaed under the
term "gay" only reinforces the impossibility, although
crucial activity, of managing, to say nothing of answering,
the arguments that obsess contemporary queer
theory and identity politics.
In
particular, Word of Mouth continually puts pressure on the representation
of gay sexuality. At times the poems in the anthology are explicitly
homosexual:
grain of love
we had,
2 men on a cot, a silk
cover and a green cloth
over the lamp.
The music was just right.
I blew him like a symphony,
it floated and
he took me
down the street and
left me here. (176)
Other
times they are not:
Now
so late that my body
darkens and the gossip of years
goes on loosening the tides of
my body, now so late that
the time of waiting itself loosens
new pains in me, I hear
the sound of the bow-string. (29)
In
that many of the poems in Word of Mouth are in fact love poems,
it foregrounds the conditions of gay love, sex and desire, but
in the end, does not try to presented a unified or single minded
account of those conditions. Rather Word of Mouth seems to suggest
that it depends on whom and how you read, and consequently,
Word of Mouth leaves the question of what counts as "gay"
poetry up to the poems - in their multiple and often contradictory
ways - and more importantly, to their readers.
Joel
Bettridge is a Ph. D. candidate in Poetics at the State University
of New York at Buffalo. His poetry and criticism have appeared
in a number of literary magazines.
|